Archive for the ‘Players’ Category

As we get to the business end of the season, the whinging about referees has started to  increase in volume and frequency.

Kenny Dalglish as a menager during pre-season ...

Kenny Dalglish as a menager during pre-season friendly Vålerenga v. Liverpool on 1st August 2011 at Ullevål. Result: 3-3. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

One can hear the petulant shriek (it’s just not FAIR!) of managers across the land, be it the whining of those facing relegation such as Mark Hughes, the perennial moaning of the title favourite Alex Ferguson or the excuse-making and swivel-eyed conspiracy theories of a manager under pressure such as Kenny Dalglish. We all love to have a scapegoat, someone to deflect the blame onto in order to mask our own deficiencies and for football managers the referee is just that.

But the truth is that refereeing standards are pretty decent. Yes, there are mistakes made, but then referees are, to use a worn cliché, only human and where humanity exists then mistakes and imperfection exist. Players and managers themselves are not perfect. A striker will not score with every chance, a player will not complete every pass (unless he’s Xavi) and a goalkeeper will not save every shot. Referees cannot be expected to get every call exactly spot on given the pace of the game and the interpretive nature of many of the rules.

Over the last decade there has been a lot of talk about using video technology.  It’s been successfully brought in with other sports such as rugby and cricket and has generally been effective in producing better decisions. However it has made referees more cautious and more reliant on it to make the tough decisions. Video tech can also ruin those pure moments of joy when a wicket is taken or a try scored, as everyone waits for confirmation. In the end you get two celebrations, both muted, which does not make for a better spectacle or for more enjoyable games. Due to football’s more fluid nature when compared to the more stop/start way that cricket and rugby works you do wonder whether integrating video technology would work. Plus, the football authorities and to a certain extent many major media outlets just haven’t had an open and constructive debate about how it would work in practical terms.

If a manager is so concerned or incensed about poor refereeing then why are they not putting some of the formidable resource of their football clubs to bear on the matter? Players are trained and drilled to the nth degree ahead of matches so the opposition is known. Why do managers not have an informed view on whether the referee is likely to be inconsistent or susceptible to the roar of the home crowd. What are the areas of weaknesses in the way he applies the rules. If a ref is particularly fastidious about diving, for example, then managers should know and pass this on to the players as part of their match preparation. If it’s that important then it seems it would be worthwhile to employ a referee scout to stockpile dossiers on them.

But simply put, there is no grand conspiracy against any particular club by referees. Refs are easy targets who aren’t allowed to talk to the press about their decisions, so can’t talk back and defend themselves. And can’t offer criticisms of the way that managers and players act during the game, though I’m sure referees would have a lot to say about some of the diva-style behaviour if given a chance.

Anyway you look at it, a manager who whinges about the referee but hasn’t done anything to plan and mitigate around an inconsistent referee and the resulting impact is, frankly, a chump.

Mario has taken over our lives at 1FITG Towers. We can’t stop thinking of him, wondering what is he doing RIGHT NOW.

That lead us to our favourite Super Mario Balotelli moments. Here is our list – what are we missing? Spoof (funny) stories welcome too….

1. What do you do when you’ve got a day off and a younger family member to entertain? Go to a womens prison of course! Mario drove his Mercedes Coupe into a women’s prison in Manchester, the officer explained that the pair were questioned for half an hour and said they were “specially curious at the fact it was a women’s prison”.

2. When a youngster asked for an autograph outside City’s training ground, Balotelli demanded to know why the boy was playing truant. After the child revealed he was being bullied, Balotelli drove the boy and his mother to the school in question so he could tackle the bully himself. He demanded to see the headmaster to make him aware of the issue and then mediated between the two boys to resolve the issue. A source said: “Mario feels strongly aboutbullying.”

3. Since moving to Manchester, Balotelli has racked up £10,000 in parking fines and had his white Maserati impounded 27 times. Once he was pulled over by the police who wanted to enquire why he had £25,000 in cash on his front seat. Balotelli reorted: “Because I can.”

4. After gambling at Manchester’s 235 Casino, Balotelli walked away with winnings of £25,000. Feeling generous, he gave a homeless man ‘with ginger dreadlocks and a beard’ £1,000.

5. When Mario spotted the prostitute Jenny Thompson, who was linked with Wayne Rooney, leaving the toilets of a restaurant, he chanted “Rooney, Rooney” before flicking a middle finger at her friends. He then offered to fight one of her entourage. Click here for the full story.At the same restaurant as the above incident a beautiful WAG wannabe walked in. Balotelli shouted ‘Hey!’ with food tumbling out of his mouth. The WAG went over and without saying a word, Balotelli handed her his phone so she could input her number. Plaaaaaaya

6. Mario’s mum over from Italy, asks the cleaner if she has everything she needs. Cleaner: “No, I need all the practical things – iron etc.” Mario’s mum: “Where can we go to buy these things? Write me a list and we’ll go and buy it all” Cleaner: “John Lewis.” So Mario’s ma sends him & his mates to John Lewis with a shopping list in hand…Mario returns to the house 5 hrs later…empty-handed. Cleaner: “Where’s the iron, iron-board etc?” Then a big John Lewis van arrives…van contains nothing from the shopping list bt the following ‘practical items’: – giant trampoline, Scalextric, 2 Vespas, table tennis set’

NOVEMBER 5, 2008 - Football : Wayne Rooney of ...

Image via Wikipedia

“It was indefensible really. We were winning 2-1, only needed a draw to qualify and Wayne has let the team, the manager and country down,”said England captain John Terry, immediately after the 2-2 draw with Montenegro in Podgorica, in which Wayne Rooney’s petulance earned him a red card in the 74th minute.
…or at least that is what he should have said.
But instead we go this spineless assessment from JT:
“I hope Wayne doesn’t get too much stick. What happened was unfortunate but it was one of those things. It means that he misses one or two games when we get there but it’s important to realise that, without him, we wouldn’t be in this position.
“He’s been absolutely magnificent for England and I hope people don’t criticise him too much. The important thing is we got the right result and we’re through.”
Oh John, you are wrong on so many levels.First of all, how exactly was the red card brandished by Wolfgang Stark unfortunate? Rooney deliberately kicked out at his opponent Miodrag Dzudovic with absolutely no provocation from the Montenegrin, when his team were still leading 2-1 and 20-odd minutes away from a certain place in the finals.

Secondly, is there anyone out there who seriously thinks England would have failed to qualify from a group containing mediocre Switzerland, Montenegro and Wales sides and an atrocious Bulgaria one without Mr Short Fuse leading the line?

And the claim that Rooney has been “magnificent for England” would make even the most fervent revisionist historian blush.

Patchy

Though it is undoubted that on his day Rooney is one of England’s best players, and certainly one of the most naturally gifted, his record for the national side is patchy at best.

Until his injury in Euro 2004, Rooney was undoubtedly one of the stars of the tournament, and tore the French, Swiss and Croatian defences to shreds that summer with his fearless forward play.

But since those heady days, Rooney has been something of a curse for England in tournaments. In 2006, he was unfit, unproductive and petulant once more, red carded for the first time in an England shirt in the quarter final against Portugal, as the Three Lions limped out of yet another tournament (and a very open one with no truly outstanding side) on penalties. England of course failed to reach the 2008 Euro finals with the Manchester United frontman scoring just two goals in the most dismal and depressing of qualifying campaigns.

And of course, there was last summer. The debacle of South Africa. A highly favourable group and route to the semi finals- should they have topped the group- squandered pathetically by Capello and his hapless squad. Rooney had arguably the biggest stinker of a tournament out of any player in the finals, taking into consideration his perceived quality, reputation and the excellent goal scoring season he had had in the Premier League and a highly impressive World Cup qualifying campaign.

There is no doubt he was not fully fit and that he may have been concerned with off the field allegations soon to break worldwide (his own fault) but his performances were poor and the contempt he showed to the travelling England fans was the cherry on top of a terrible campaign.

And now, before the Euro 2012 finals are anywhere near to beginning, and the 16 finalists haven’t even been confirmed or the groups drawn, Rooney has already negatively affected England’s tournament.

So, a quick waltz through Rooney’s history in a England shirt does not hold up kindly to Terry’s claims that “he has been magnificent” for the national side. That is not to say he hasn’t had inspired games or patches, or that other players (bar maybe Ashley Cole and pre-injury Rio Ferdinand) have been consistently brilliant either.

But back to the original point about fellow players defending his actions in Montenegro. These days in football there seems to be an unwritten rule between players- and many managers- that you cannot criticise one of your own to the media or in public too harshly. You seem to have to ‘protect’ your player from criticism, not to give them the kick up the backside they more often than not deserve.

This is one of the most nauseating things in modern football, and I suggest that this ‘protecting’ doesn’t always have the desired effect. In fact it often reinforces the mollycoddled, prima donnas that we see in the Premier League and International football almost every week.

But in 1998, then England manager Glenn Hoddle, though pleading with the media not to destroy David Beckham, admitted that the midfielder had let down the country and team. In public! The public criticism from Hoddle reportedly hurt Beckham, and it has been written about plenty how he responded and eventually became England’s captain and talisman for a good period. Not to forget winning the Champions League the season the year after the 1998 World Cup.

On a managerial level, the late great Brian Clough was left humiliated by a very public snub from Leeds boss Don Revie. Instead of sulking, Clough duly used the snub from Revie as a motivation to better the achievements of his arch-rival’s successful but ugly Leeds teams of the early 1970s. Two league titles with unfashionable Derby County and two European Cups and a Division one trophy with Nottingham Forest suggests he did so with aplomb.

You see, a public dressing down, snub or kick up the backside is not always a bad thing. It might actually be a blessing in disguise, a helping hand. And if players and managers could be honest about disciplinary incidents more often than they are to the media, perhaps there is a chance that the sinning player might show some strength of character, work harder to win back their manager, fans and teammates trust and learn from the experience.

Worth a try, isn’t it?

United have learnt from Barcelona

Quick passing, movement and in the last third – two touch football. United have learnt from their defeats to Barcelona in recent years and Fergie has added what his team has been missing since Tevez and Ronaldo left – pace. Not only physical pace, but quickness of thought too. Young, Cleverly (who was nearly released as a teen according to Gary Neville), Jones and Wellbeck have added to the already dynamic Nani, Evra and Rooney. The second goal was art in football form, straight from the Nou Camp.

City have a team to challenge

They weren’t as sharp as United from kick off but they still went 2-0 up at half time. Apart from Silva none of their players really turned up, but still, went 2-0 up. They will be better for the loss and their solid spine of Hart, Kompany, De Jong and Toure will win them points simply from grinding teams down. Silva (who I have to say I was skeptical about) is the joker of the pack, he can turn a game on a sixpence – his passing and movement are a joy to watch – a Modric but further up the pitch – one thing that they need to sort out is Tevez. Aguero may be a replacement but even if he is, Tevez got over 40% of City’s goals last year…

Dzeko has a good shot 

But maybe not much else. I have watched Dzeko with interest, he had a fantastic time in Germany (66 goals in 111 games) and when he moved it was after a poor season with Wolfsburg he needed time to settle and didn’t really get going last season. Yet after a full pre-season he still looks cumbersome, slow and his first touch at times was dire. He may come good, but he doesn’t look great at the moment. But at least he has a good shot.

Cleverly has a chance

When Cleverly came on at half time United were much quicker, getting the ball deep or on the centre circle he sprayed it right, left and forward. Quickly moving with the ball and getting it back and moving it. His technique is ever so slightly awkward (his body shape tends to lean forwards/downwards too much) but he dominated the midfield against Toure and De Jong, and that isn’t a mean feat. Maybe Carrick is the first to be worried…

Super Mario didn’t get his 1-UP this morning

I love Mario Ballotelli. He has all the technical talent in the world, has swagger, pace and attitude. But his mental state isn’t quite there. From the moment he got into a tussle with Vidic you knew he hadn’t got his 1-Up this morning. Gary Neville said that he was an embarrassment to Mancini and Jamie Redknapp said he was a liability – it’s hard to argue with either of them at the moment. But…if he can turn it on, even if it’s only for 6 weeks at some point in the season, then he could be worth his weight in gold coins.

Michael Owen - Real Madrid

Image via Wikipedia

Football was embroiled again in another Twitter sparked furore after Wayne Rooney ‘offered out’ a fan who abused him on the social networking site.

Recently we’ve seen Carlton Cole and Ryan Babel find themselves on the wrong end of FA disciplinary proceedings after tweeted remarks. And if you’re inclined to dismiss it as a storm in tea cup you could always try telling that to the two Scottish footballers who were sacked after comments about Neil Lennon.

So against this background you’d be forgiven for thinking that controversy was the default setting where Twitter and footballers were concerned.

However, in this turbulent sea of dispute and debate there is an oasis of calm. Somewhere we can enjoy the peace and quiet of mundane observation and bland platitude. Safe from the siren calls of incisive observation, trenchant opinion, or pure splenetic bile.

Where is this tranquil shore I hear you ask. Why it’s Michael Owen’s twitter feed.

Here’s the former teen prodigy on Avram Grant’s sacking:

“Who will take over at West Ham? I’m sure they will get a big name, they are a great club with great history. Plenty of people will want it.”

And the Premiership relegation battle.

“Hard to predict who will be going down. Nobody seems to deserve it this season. What a day to be sat on the sofa watching events unfold.”

Not even the return of sectarianism to Scottish football can trap Michael Owen.

“What about that chap tonight who attacked Neil Lennon? Not good for Scottish football or the game in general.”

Where the rest of the football world froths itself up into lather, Michael serenely navigates these seas. Avoiding anything which might be mistaken as controversial or, even more worryingly, an opinion.

Even Michael’s off field life is equally as tranquil.

“Porridge for breakfast. Just watching the golf on tv before I get showered.”

But surely there must be a flaw. Nobody can be that perfect. And I have to admit there has been one breach of Michael’s even tempered approach to events that confront him in his life.

“Filling out the forms so I can buy my allocation of 16 tickets for the champions league final. Just seen the price of them £225. Joke.”

However, for Michael there is a happy ending. Fortunately he’ll be able to sit and watch the Champions League final for free – from his usual vantage point of the substitutes bench.

In the first part of his masterpiece, the Divine Comedy, Dante is accompanied by the Roman poet Virgil as he travels through the circles of hell where punishments fit the crimes of those cast below into Satan’s lair. I have no idea what fans of clubs who consistently have to compete in the playoffs have done in previous lives, but it must have been pretty bad to justify the psychological torture that they are forced to endure at this point of the season.

The playoff system is at once exciting, hopeful and cruel. For some it’s an exciting novelty, for others it’s the inevitable end to a season that promised much but failed to live up to expectations.

Though exciting for all concerned, the playoffs offer differing types of excitement. For neutral observers it’s the thrill of seeing teams put everything on the line with massive prizes up for grabs, not least in the Championship playoffs where a place in the promised land of the Premiership beckons. For fans of the clubs involved its like a mini cup run for teams that often don’t get to play in the latter stages of the cups, and a chance to potentially have a day in the sun at Wembley.

For the hopeful the playoffs can be a joy. Teams that have been on the outskirts of the playoffs for most of the season and have managed to sneak in with a late charge can embrace the role of underdogs with nothing to lose and everything to gain. This can be a great boost, contributing to a ‘what the hell, lets have a go’ attitude that higher placed sides may not be able to muster.

For those fans that sit in optimism corner, with positive outlooks and hope in their hearts, it can offer an extra chance to redeem a season that hasn’t gone quite as well as it could have, but could end up with the outcome that was sought from the start.

But the playoffs can be cruel. For teams that have been chasing automatic promotion and missed out by a whisker it can be an ignominy to have to face teams that may have been 10 or more points behind them all season. The pressure of being favourites while having to recover from the psychological blow of missing out on the automatic spot can often be hard to bear. For those perennial playoff contenders the hope that’s raised only to be dashed once again can be exceedingly cruel, as yet again a season that promised so much ends in disappointment

At this time of the season, everything is heightened. Injustices are more unjust, bad refereeing decisions sting further, goals are sweeter, the game is studied and analysed and mulled over in more depth. It can be all-consuming. But the fact is that three of the four teams involved in each division will be disappointed. And it’s the mill of hope, despair and crushing, crushing failure that get to you. Though failure in the playoffs cannot match Judas’ punishment in the centre of hell, where he is perpetually chewed and skinned in Satan’s bloodred maw, in the immediate aftermath it can often feel that way. I’ll just be happy if I manage to get through this whole thing without too many tears or too much vomit.

English football (soccer) referee Howard Webb

Image via Wikipedia

“Sure I saw him forearm the lad McCarthy. But what can I say I’ve always been a Manchester United fan so I was never going to send Rooney off.” So says Mark Clattenburg explaining his decision to turn a blind eye to a seemingly obvious red card offence.

Speaking later in the week Martin Atkinson explained his decision to send Nemanja Vidic off in the dying moments of the game: “Every time I have a game with him he’s always bitching and moaning about this or that decision. I’d been looking for a chance to send him off all game and teach him a lesson. He tugged the shirt, I thought, thank you very much and pulled out the red.”

Of course none of this happened. I made it all up. The referees in question said no such thing. Unfortunately, they abide by the rules of their employers and maintain a stoic silence as Alex Ferguson ignores the rules applying to him about questioning referees integrity. So much for the FA’s respect agenda.

The trouble is referees are an easy target for managers for the simple reason they can’t answer back. You can heap abuse and derision upon them, and if you’ve got a big enough reputation like the Govan gobshite Fergie then you’re probably not even worried about getting punished.

But what if referees could answer back? And what if referees could actually fire the opening salvos in a war of words with a manager?

Imagine if Howard Webb, ahead of Manchester derby, spoke about how Rio Ferdinand had harangued him in the tunnel after the last game. “I hope Rio doesn’t try tackling in the box. Any excuse to give a penalty and I’m pointing at the spot.”

If referees were allowed to mark the card of players and referees I think we’d find there’d be a sudden a new found respect for the match officials. I’m guessing managers would find themselves having a new found sympathy for that difficult offside decision. All for fear of antagonising the same referee at any future fixture. The FA could even start choosing referees on the basis of promoting their respect agenda. Courteous behaviour could be rewarded with a sympathetic referee.

And unapologetic recalcitrant’s like Ferguson? Well they could find themselves with Martin Atkinson every week.

 

Clarke Carlisle

Image via Wikipedia

Being feted as Britain’s brainiest footballer is akin to being lauded as the least corrupt member of FIFA or Bulgaria’s most beautiful shot-putter.  In short: it’s not really something worth bragging about.

That said, Clarke Carlisle performance on this weeks Question Time was nothing short of revelatory. In a week where Jermaine Pennant was dumb enough to forget he even owned an £98000 Porsche left rusting away for 5 months at a Zaragoza train station, to see Clarke holding his own amongst senior political heavyweights was a refreshing surprise.

In the company of such seasoned orators as George Galloway, Alistair Campbell and David Dimbleby, Carlisle displayed an intelligence and loquaciousness that make him look like the John F. Kennedy of the footballing world.

Carlisle has previous though.  He won a one off game show called “Britain’s Brainiest Footballer” in 2002 which had such intellectual colossi as Alan Brazil and Malcolm MacDonald amongst its contestants.  He also appeared on Countdown in 2010 and won his episode.

“I can’t say it’s better than winning a big football game – but it’s up there.”

Apart from his day job as Burnley’s centre-back he is also Chairman of the PFA.  Not bad for a guy who was struggling with the alcohol abuse as recently as 2003.

Whilst tempers were fraying with Galloway accusing Campbell of having Iraqi blood on his hands in his sexing up the “dodgy dossier” and Campbell accusing Galloway of sucking up to former dictator Saddam Hussein, Clarke maintained an air of cool dignity.  When the time came to make his point he made an impassioned speech stating that he would like to see anyone responsible for sending our brave soldiers to war being held accountable should that war be found to be illegal.  As his own cousin is currently serving in Afghanistan it was obvious that this wasn’t idle politicking.

He even managed to get some football related metaphors on the topic of NHS reforms.

“One area that did catch my eye was the cutting out of the middlemen for GPs. Now this is something akin to my own industry, it’s like putting a director of football in a football club to control player acquisitions. He might see a player he thinks is valuable, buy him for the team but the actual manager doesn’t believe this guy fits into what he needs for his team. Now this can cause friction between manager and board level.”

On the subject of the uneasy Con-Dem coalition there were more sporting comparisons

“The best teams and most successful teams are the ones that have every worker pulling in the same direction. You have to compromise when you have conflicting views and as we’re finding with this new coalition, when you compromise you come to some very unhappy results.”

Afterwards Clarke openly admitted that appearing on the programme was:

“Way out of his comfort zone”.

And

“Probably the scariest thing he has ever done”.

Surely not as scary as playing away at The Den on a cold Tuesday night though, eh Clarke?

The disastrous home defeat on penalties to Northampton Town in the third round of the Carling Cup has once again brought into sharp focus the alarming decline of Liverpool football club as a major force in English football.

Roy Hodgson

Can Roy Hodgson revive Liverpool's ailing fortunes?

Roy Hodgson’s side have made a limp start to the current Premier League campaign with just 5 points amassed from five admittedly tough fixtures, and expectations have hardly been lower of a team widely tipped to challenge strongly or even win the title over the last few years.

Nonetheless, they were expected to roll over their League Two opponents convincingly in Wednesday’s tie, but instead contrived to produce arguably the most humiliating result in the club’s proud history, surpassing the infamous Worcester City defeat before Bill Shankly arrived and changed the course of English football history.

Liverpool were simply dreadful for most of the match, devoid of quality, guile and outfought and out-thought by their humble opponents. There are no excuses for such a lifeless and diabolical display from a team littered with enough experienced first-teamers, squad players and prospective academy graduates to win comfortably. Hodgson wore the look of a man incandescent with rage for a great part of the match, and though criticism is likely to be levelled at him for fielding an experimental team and resting major stars like Fernando Torres and Steven Gerrard, it is hard not to feel he has been badly let down by the players he had given an opportunity to stake a claim for future first team involvement.

In one of the few competitions they had any chance of winning this season, and with Chelsea, Manchester City and Everton all making unexpected early exits, it is extremely careless that Liverpool have followed suit with such a kind home draw.

So where did it all go wrong? Title challengers to mid-table also-rans in just over a year. Conventional wisdom points to the almost unanimously despised American owners and boardroom troubles as the main culprits for Liverpool’s current malaise. Though these distractions have undoubtedly made an indelible mark and coincided with the remarkable drop in form over the last year and a half, this assumption, though not without significant merit, is simplistic and only half the story. Undoubtedly, the ongoing squabbles, mooted and then failed takeovers and general lack of money to invest in a remarkably average squad have been major problems for the Premier League giants. But, as with the desperate showing in the Carling cup on Wednesday night, the bulk of the criticism must lay with the current and former managers and playing staff.

The truth is, Rafa Benitez made some disastrous moves in the transfer market over his six year reign, but none more so than in the last year of his tenure. The money that was made available for transfers through the board or recouped sales was simply spent in a reckless fashion. With the goal burden on the classy but injury prone Torres and captain marvel Gerrard glaringly obvious to most outside observers, it was assumed a quality striker would be brought in by Benitez upon the sale of Xabi Alonso. Instead, the Spaniard added an injured and unproven Alberto Aquilani and spent a ludicrously inflated £18m on Glen Johnson whilst offloading a perfectly capable and talented right back in Arbeloa for a paltry £5m.

Also, the man management of the aforementioned Xabi Alonso (arguably Liverpool’s best and most influential player for many years, Gerrard aside) was simply diabolical. Much to his credit, Alonso continued to be an outstanding performer in his final season for the Reds after the botched attempts to land Gareth Barry as a replacement, but understandably he decided to leave for Real Madrid the following summer.  Factor in the flop signings of Ryan Babel and Andreas Dossena and suddenly Liverpool’s squad was starting to look decidedly average.  Midfielder Lucas Leiva has been much maligned by the Koppites, and put in a typically awful and unproductive performance on Wednesday night. But such is the dearth of talent currently in Liverpool’s squad, the Brazilian is a regular first teamer. So, from being so close to their maiden Premier League title in 2008-9, in which only a few sloppy home draws stopped them from being deservedly crowned champions, Liverpool flopped badly in 2009-10, finishing a lowly seventh with an incredible 11 defeats.

There is no doubt Hodgson inherited a real mess from his predecessor, and early accounts suggest he is struggling to arrest the slide. It is hard to see the signings of Konchesky, Jovanovic, Mereiles and Poulsen  taking Liverpool to the next level, and perhaps this proud club will be spending a few seasons in the relative wilderness unless lady luck shines brightly on them.  Realistically, Hodgson may have to use his undoubted ability to stabilise the club and provide a minimum of Europa League football until the much needed takeover of the club happens. Though he has a difficult job on his hands placating the hordes of loyal fans who have come to expect a lot more. And rumours will continue to amass concerning the future of Torres unless Liverpool can be seen to be challenging the elite both financially and on the pitch.

Roy Hodgson knew he had a tough job on his hands on taking on the Liverpool hot seat this summer. Perhaps the task of rebuilding a huge but sickly club is much bigger than he first thought.

Lokomotiv Moscow fansAs the date when FIFA’s executive committee finally make a decision on who will host the 2018 World Cup draws closer, England and Russia appear to be the bids most likely to emerge triumphant when the result is announced in Zurich on 2 December.

With rival bids from the United States, Belgium and the Netherlands and Spain and Portugal failing to capture the public imagination, the battle to stage the 2018 tournament has effectively become a two-horse race.

Since a six-man FIFA delegation visited these shores in August and praised amongst other things the infrastructure and stadia as well as the passion of the supporters, England’s bid seems to have recovered some of its poise after the near fatal blow delivered by the Daily Mail’s shameful entrapment of former  FA Chairman Lord Triesman back in May.

FIFA President Sepp Blatter even suggested that staging the competition in England would be “the easiest way to organise the World Cup… Everything is there – fans, stadiums, infrastructure – it’s easy.”

But Russia remains a serious adversary, despite the obvious logistical problems of hosting the tournament in such a enormous and diverse country. With enthusiastic backing from the Kremlin, an ever-improving domestic competition and the distinction of having never hosted the tournament before, Russia’s bid certainly has a lot going for it. In the grandstanding way we have all become accustomed to over the years, Blatter is also keen for the tournament to leave a lasting legacy once the eyes of the world are focused elsewhere. Staging the World Cup in Russia would certainly have a more significant cultural impact than in the so-called cradle of football.

Lord Triesman’s allegations about a Spanish-Russian conspiracy to bribe referees in South Africa could also count against England’s bid should the Spanish and Portuguese joint bid drop out of the running.

However, despite appearing to have the momentum in the bidding war of late, Russia’s bid sustained an almighty blow last week, albeit inadvertently, courtesy of an unheralded Nigerian striker. To celebrate the sale of Peter Odemwingie to Premiership newcomers West Brom, Lokomotiv Moscow fans unfurled a banner showing a banana and the message: “Thanks West Brom”. Despite protestations from the head of Russia’s 2018 World Cup bid, Alexei Sorokin, the country’s dark secret was out in the open and splashed all over the English press. Racism is still a huge problem in Russian football, and FIFA has been given a timely reminder of what black players could face should the tournament be staged in Russia.

The fact that Sorokin denied the banner was even racist, despite the obvious connotations of the banana, suggests it is an endemic problem that the Russian bid team will find it difficult to keep a lid on. He shamefully tried to gloss over the issue by bizarrely claiming that “there is nothing racial in it. If there would be another player – from Russia, Denmark, Norway or Japan, for example – the reaction could be the same. In Russia ‘to get a banana’ means ‘to fail a test somewhere’.”

Odemwingie, to his credit, suggested that only a minority of Lokomotiv fans were behind the banner, but he did say that black players were regularly subjected to insults in the Russian league, recalling a chorus of monkey chants against him in a game with fierce rivals CSKA Moscow. Marseille’s black players were also subjected to racist chants in a European tie with Zenit St Petersburg two years ago, resulting in a £38,000 fine for the Russian club from UEFA.

With the issue of racism in Russian football now under the full glare of the media spotlight, it could be the intervention of Peter Odemwingie, not Sepp Blatter, which ultimately brings the World Cup to England in 2018.