Posts Tagged ‘Spurs’

Harry Redknapp, manager of Tottenham Hotspur, ...

Image via Wikipedia

‘Special’ is very subjective isn’t it?

Harry Redknapp has suggested Spurs will sign a special player in January, but not Tevez, so don’t get excited Spurs fans.

The comment does raise a question though, who is this ‘special’ player?

Will Harry Redknapp keep it close to the family, Lampard seems to be out of favour…? Though quite how he fits into a dynamic Spurs midfield I’m not sure.

How about a bit of Torres? He certainly has special hair, could Harry’s man management bring out the best in a player who hasn’t seen form for 2 and a half years?

Or how about Leandro Damiao? Playing at quasi Spurs feeder club Internacional in Brazil, the boy is certainly special.

Then again, Zamora was linked with Spurs in the Evening Standard yesterday and Titus Bramble is certainly ‘special’ in his own way…who knows, ‘special’ is subjective after all.

Who do you fancy Spurs fans?

Yesterday we found out that Harry Redknapp was going to miss the Tottenham v Rubin Kazan match because of a “medical procedure”.

First thought I had was that this was a way of Harry getting out of a long trip to the back of beyond and because none of the Tottenham first team were being risked it was fine sending in Bond and Jordan to deal with the youngsters.

Louise Redknapp interviews her father-in-law H...

Image via Wikipedia

But it seems my cynicism was misplaced.

Instead Harry Redknapp had stents which is a ‘minor’ heart procedure.

A blog from British Heart Foundation on the subject has said:

“…The procedure can help relieve the symptoms of angina. It’s also used as an emergency treatment for people who’ve had a heart attack or unstable angina.

Most people can go home the same day or the next day, unless you’ve had an emergency angioplasty when it’s likely you’ll need to stay in hospital for a day or two longer.Many will find that they’re back to normal after a few days, though you’ll be probably be advised to avoid activities, such as heavy lifting or driving for a week or so.

In the vast majority of cases, the blood flow through the artery is improved, and people will find that their symptoms have improved.” 

You can read the full British Heart Foundation blog on their website.

Best of lucky Harry and no matter who you support, sure everyone is wishing you a speedy recovery.

The short answer is: a hell of a lot. Now for the long answer…

As you will have undoubtedly seen in the papers, West Ham and Spurs are in the middle of a bitter battle for the small patch of east London where the Olympics will be held next year.

The decision looks like an easy one. West Ham United Football Club is likely to be relegated this year. Regardless of this, the club cannot sell out Upton Park. Even for the biggest games of the year.

On the other hand, Spurs regularly sells out White Hart Lane despite it being one of the hardest grounds to get to. The club is in the Champions League, has always attracted big sponsors and has a season ticket waiting list of over 34,000.

In addition, Haringey council has hardly made it an easy decision for Spurs to stay in Tottenham. Whereas Arsenal received public money to help with transport to the Emirates, Spurs have been told to cough up £3million on top of a raft of other community projects.

So why wouldn’t the club want to move three stops from the City and a couple from Canary Wharf? It could probably charge more for hospitality than any other UK club if it secured the location (and a consistent run in the Champions League lest we forget – it’s not a certainty).

In comparison, West Ham’s promise to keep the running track for athletics and to let kids use it in the summer for community events looks a bit flimsy and whimsical. Yes, Spurs would knock the stadium built with public money down, but do the powers that be want a white elephant in east London?

The same noises were made when the Millennium Dome was built. Indeed, the venue was empty for years until AEG came along. That’s the same AEG that has partnered with Spurs and will put on massive gigs and other events in the summer.

So, from a cold-hearted Spurs business viewpoint, it looks like the decision is made. It would be cheaper for Spurs to move there, it will be easier for Spurs fans to get to (and fill the stadium) and it would be easier for Spurs to attract better rates for corporate hospitality.

But all of these things are irrelevant to lots of Spurs fans. Because the postcode for the new stadium starts with E and not N. Despite the Stratford site being only just over seven miles from Paxton Road, it may as well be the moon for many. (Incidentally, Upton Park is well under two miles away.)

Football should be about more than business. I know Tottenham Hotspur and many other clubs are publicly listed companies now, but sod the shareholders, it is fans that matter most.

We have rivalries in football because of location. And football grew into the most popular game in the world out of these rivalries.

It would make commercial sense for Tottenham and Arsenal to say: “Let’s forget about the last 100-odd years. Come on, let’s form North London United.”

But that doesn’t make it right. Putting fans first = putting football first.

(Plus, Chas & Dave think it is wrong, so that is end of argument.)

 

David Beckham before the first annual COPA Min...

Image via Wikipedia

I remember trying to see Ian Dury & the Blockheads play. He was badly ill at the time and it was rumoured to be his last gig.

I didn’t have a ticket but I aimed to buy one off a tout. Unfortunately, with morbid gawkers like myself thronging round the venue, prices were in excess of £50. Money which I considered better spent in the pub. I abandoned my plans for the gig.

The fact Dury clung on for another couple of years playing numerous other ‘farewell’ gigs only served to confirm the wisdom of my choice.

David Beckham seems to be on a similar farewell tour. Albeit one not prompted by impending death – however, much some rather uncharitable souls may wish it. So far the circus has pitched its tent at Madrid, Milan, Los Angeles and now, seemingly, at Tottenham.

The idea is that this is Beckham’s last chance to play in the Premiership. Our final opportunity to say goodbye to the most celebrated English footballer of the last 20 years. But is it?

Without pace or the legs to do 90 minutes of top level football he has become an irrelevance to the rhythms of the wider game. However, his advancing years haven’t diminished his ability to deliver an unerringly accurate cross, corner or free kick. As long as his dedication to training remains that skill is likely to remain.

Beckham has talked of playing on to 40, perhaps he’s being modest, because I don’t see any reason why he could creak on to at least 45. In recent times Teddy Sheringham was still playing at 41, and the lower leagues legend Tony Ford at 42. Hell, Sir Stanley Matthews won the triple playing in the Maltese League at the preposterous age of 55.

Beckham is now showbusiness and there’s no reason why chairman and managers at clubs around the world wouldn’t welcome him with open arms for years to come. He’d put a few thousand on the gate, shift a few shirts and small kids love him. He might even weigh in with an assist.

Too far fetched? Consider Romario who, long past his sell by date, went on a global tour in pursuit of his 1000th career goal.

But then comes the next ridiculous thought. Without a landmark like that for Beckham to aim at, does there ever actually need to be a goodbye? Perhaps Beckham is less Ian Dury and more Bob Dylan whose ‘never ending tour’ began in 1988 and has been rolling ever since.

I no longer consider it beyond the realms of possibility.